Pelosi, Dems Promised To Stop “Profiling”

This article was posted by Steve Gilbert on Thursday, November 9th, 2006 at 8:36 am. You can leave a response.

55 Responses to “Pelosi, Dems Promised To Stop “Profiling””

1. Lyn Wilson
   November 9th, 2006 at 12:27 pm

   Okay I hate to seem insensative or “incorrect” but does this mean that muslims will stop profiling Jewish people?

2. SG
   November 9th, 2006 at 12:33 pm

   “that muslims will stop profiling Jewish people?”

   Or infidels? Or even member of their cult who have an ever so slightly different interpretation of the apocalypse from them?

3. Kilmeny
   November 9th, 2006 at 1:11 pm

   Toddlers and elderly white women of the world, beware. Thanks to Pelosi, you can rest easy, as you are being searched and detained at the airport, that the civil liberties of young Muslim men everywhere are safe and unsullied.

4. retire05
   November 9th, 2006 at 1:16 pm

   Although 19 Muslim men between the ages of 20 and 45 were responsible for killing 3,000 Americans of all races and religions on 9-11-01, it is hereby decreed by the newly elected Democratic Party that from this day forward only white women over the age of 65 will be profiled and will be subject to strip searches if they act even the slightest bid angry about the profiling. This had been brought about by a group of Democrats such as John Conyers, who puts his taxpayer website in Arabic so that Muslims will know their rights to kill us with out being profiled and Charles Rangel, the World Worker’s Party’s favorite speaker who sees that the Islamofascist have many of the same ideals as the socialist/Marxist groups who want control of the western world. The group made this decision based on the numerous mall bombings that were filmed on security cameras and have been committed by white Christian women, in the name of Christ.
   “You cannot assume that these people are all pro-American” says Rangel. “It is suspected that they could hide bombs in their blood pressure medicine bottles creating damage to the In-Flight magazine provided to all passengers” Rangel explains.

   OK, so I am now going to take my BMW Z-3 convertible and drive around a Muslim neighborhood. When I see a group of young Muslim men standing on a corner, I will pull over and just sit there. If the police don’t see something odd about a white person driving around in a BMW in a Muslim neighborhood, checking out young Muslim men, I will then move on to a black neighborhood. I am sure the police will agree there is nothing odd about a white person in a Beemer crusing around a black neighborhood, right?

   The “For Sale” sign just went up on the United States. The only problem? You have to be able to read Arabic to know what it says.

5. NotStuckOnStupid
   November 9th, 2006 at 2:17 pm

   God, I hate those people.

   (Nice moustache, Nancy).

6. Miss B. Haven
   November 9th, 2006 at 2:28 pm

   Thank you, to all the Democrats in power, for being what you are, because you’re just bound to give people like Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and countless others vast materials for their next best-sellers/news columns/radio shows, thereby enriching the poeple you hate the most.

   I can see that I’m going to have to take up kick-boxing again if I want to get through the next two years w/o exploding from rage. Bob-and-weave, jab-cross, boxer’s shuffle, take it to a speedbag, yeah! Sorry, I just channeled Janis Shaffel for a second there.

7. Miss B. Haven
   November 9th, 2006 at 2:36 pm

   Almost forgot. Did someone off this blog call Pizza Hut last night? B/c I had a customer who made my night yesterday. Asked what specials we had and I told him, and he goes, “All that for twenty bucks? But it’ll be more after taxes. Uncle Sam has to get his share, especially since yesterday. Taxes are gonna go up now that the Democrats pulled their $hit. I hate em. Communist bastards.” It made me laugh(I did it quietly, b/c I didn’t want to offend) and he sounded just like one of you guys. sheehanjihad? 1sttofight? retire05? Anybody?

8. Dubbya
   November 9th, 2006 at 5:08 pm

   Miss B:
   You work at Pizza Hut - that’s too perfect. Of all the people on here, I would have expected you to find some good in the dem’s taking congress - soon you will have the opportunity to sling hash for more than $5.25/hour…unless, of course, you’re a manager. Then you probably are already making a steep $6.30.

   For the other Chicken Little’s on here - Just take a deep breath and settle down. Your skies aren’t falling in yet. Pour some wine, draw a bath, and put on a Mary Carpenter CD, preferably one with the song “We’ve Only Just Begun” on it. It seems fitting.

9. retire05
   November 9th, 2006 at 5:11 pm

   Nope, didn’t call Pizza Hut but the sentifments are mine.
   Here is what the future holds: when the dust has settled and the Dems are snug in their new offices, they will raise taxes. This is the procedure:
   raise taxes; less job creation for businesses and less spendable income for individuals. The national deficit will increase as there are fewer jobs and the market will not grow because companies are not expanding. So the result will be higher taxes, higher unemployment, less federal revenue, and lower dividends from investments. On a local level: property taxes will have to be increased to offset the income from sales tax (families can’t spend what they don’t have) to pay for schools who are having to absord more and more illegal children (this is happening all over the nation). Higher property taxes will mean a slump in the housing market and fewer construction jobs. Bankrupcies will increase.
   All because the Democrats failed Economics 101.
   When the stock market stops growing and producing good dividends to it’s investors, when property taxes go up because sales taxes are less, when unemployment rates increase, when the national deficit increases from fewer jobs then the independents who voted these idiots in office this year, will wonder what the hell happened and we will be able to tell them.

10. wampaku40
    November 9th, 2006 at 5:51 pm

    Nope, Dubbya, the skies are not falling, but the rug is shifting under our feet. Much more subtle. Nice to see that the first day after the elections, and the first people they meet with are the Muslims…..

11. doingwhatican
    November 9th, 2006 at 6:04 pm

    “We killed the Patriot Act” proclaimed Hissyfit Harry Reid, while foaming at the mouth and soiling his girly pink panties at the same time. What a milquetoast of a man.

12. Professor_Repulso
    November 9th, 2006 at 6:42 pm

    Remember this: “A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” — Marcus Tullius Cicero
    And by the way, there should be a reprieve on terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. They got their people elected, didn’t they?

13. retire05
    November 9th, 2006 at 7:50 pm

    Professor, fasten your seat belt, I’m afraid we are in for a bumpy ride.
    It is no measure of luck that we have avoided another attack. But with the far left now in power, the Clintonian method of government will be reenforced. Cut backs on our FBI, CIA and NSA so they can divert the money into entitlement programs. Political correctness will reach new heights. All to the advantage of those who are just waiting to do their evil deeds against the Big Satan.
    I am afraid that it will take another attack for Americans to realize that the threat has not gone away.
    Cicero had it right. As did McCarthy, J. Edgar Hoover and others who realize that the greatest threat to a society is the one from within.

14. spelunker
    November 9th, 2006 at 8:23 pm

    PR,
    Sometimes I curse the arcane bits and flotsam that lurk in the shadows of my mind, but for a change, I actually remembered what was nagging at my mind after reading the quote from Cicero; She sells sea shells by the sea shore.
    http://tinyurl.com/t24a3.

15. spelunker
    November 9th, 2006 at 8:24 pm

    Damn it, the edit function isn’t working again…She sells, sells…..I hate disjointed delivery.

16. Professor_Repulso
    November 9th, 2006 at 8:49 pm

    spelunker - I am having trouble with the link. Your mention of flotsam did kick over a chamber pot in my mind though. I can recall a time many years ago when the land around here flooded. My dad, uncle, and I went out to assess the damage. When I saw some items floating here and there, I inquired, “Hey, unk, is that flotsam or jetsam?”. His reply; “It looks more like shitsam.”. The combination of that word and Pelosi’s hideous pan caused some long dormant synapses to fire. Sorry to have wasted your time.

17. DEZ
    November 9th, 2006 at 9:58 pm

    Retire.
    I am starting to believe another attack won’t sway a lot of Americans.
    Americans were the victims of an unprecedented attack, To many shrugged their shoulders, And said we had it coming.
    They went right back to thinking the next ball game is news, And listen to the weather report, The real news that will have the biggest effect on their futures goes unnoticed.
    I wish I knew what it would take to get them to see just how ugly things are gonna get.
    But at least posts like yours give me hope, And I know I am not alone.

18. wirenut
    November 9th, 2006 at 10:02 pm

    Hey Professor, I have to ask. Is flotsam by accident and jetsam by choice? Thank you if you can clear this up for me.

19. DEZ
    November 9th, 2006 at 10:09 pm

    I am feeling another Incredible Imam coming on.

20. Professor_Repulso
    November 9th, 2006 at 10:09 pm

    One last warning: “The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending at all hazards; and it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. We have received them as a fair inheritance from our worthy ancestors: they purchased them for us with toil and danger and expense of treasure and blood, and transmitted to us with care and diligence. It will bring an everlasting mark of infamy on the present generation, enlightened as it is, if we should suffer them to be wrested from us by violence without a struggle, or be cheated out of them by the artifices of false and designing men.” Samuel Adams

21. DEZ
    November 9th, 2006 at 10:13 pm

    Prof,
    Are you trying to make liberals heads explode?
    COOL.

22. angryredhen
    November 9th, 2006 at 10:23 pm

    Speaking of artifice….that woman has the longest damn eyebrows I’ve ever seen.

23. Professor_Repulso
    November 9th, 2006 at 10:42 pm

    Those aren’t eyebrows. That is feces oozing out of her tear ducts. If you will notice, her mouth is closed. It had to go somewhere.

24. DEZ
    November 9th, 2006 at 11:08 pm

    Hell Prof.
    I think its hair.
    Before the last 20 face lifts, It was the hair just below her navel.
    one more face lift and she will have a cleft chin.

25. Professor_Repulso
    November 9th, 2006 at 11:28 pm

    Yes, DEZ, she is indeed an anatomical marvel. wirenut — you are correct, sir. “…a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom. But tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason.” Thomas Paine

26. spelunker
    November 10th, 2006 at 9:42 am

    Okay, try this link P_R,
    http://tinyurl.com/3ync9 and I think the proper term is shatsom.

    You say tomato, I say tomatoe.

27. AmericanIPA
    November 10th, 2006 at 10:08 am

    Maybe it’s just me, but something I’ve noticed in the msm presentation of congress is this: when the dems were in the minority, they were referred to as “democratic leadership” this & that, now that Republicans are in the minority, I’m seeing more of that word “minority”. Coincidence? I’ll keep an eye out.

    BTW here’s a nice little piece about media coverage leading up to their preferred outcome on Tuesday:

    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=17992

    I rather enjoyed that one.

28. nodems
    November 10th, 2006 at 11:21 am

    AmericanIPA, I recommended that Republicans buy newspapers/TV networks instead of using the money for ads during an election. That way they get the newspaper/TV and get their ads for free thereafter….just like the reporters gave free ads for Democrats every single day for months/years.

    It’s much cheaper than wasing our money on ads during elections.

29. retire05
    November 10th, 2006 at 11:21 am

    Dez, I realize there are those who think we had 9-11 coming to us. They have little understanding of the real meaning of jihad (world domination for Islam) and have been trained to think like the good little socialist they are by their oh, so liberal professors. But for the most part, when suicide bombers start going after our schools and our children like they did in Russia, Americans are not going to be too happy. There is nothing like a round of funerals, with tiny empty caskets because no body remains to bury, to get the seeds of real anger growing.
    Everyday I pray that the United States will stay safe. But I am a realist, not a Democrat with my head in the sand. I understand that the fundalmental Muslim has been on a crusade to dominate the world for Islam since the 7th century. I understand that it is easier for the imans to blame us for the pathetic conditions of Muslim nations under Shiria law than it is to accept that it is Islam itself that is the problem. Before blaming the United States for all their ills (in the days where there was no U.S.) they blamed the Jews. Of course, the imans are all fat and happy while the people they preach to are starving.
    I remember how we were at fault for all the ills of Vietnam. If we would just butt out of their business, they would work it out. So the Democrats butted out and never mentioned how many died by the hands of the Kamir Rouge and the North Vietnamese communists. It was a blood bath that the Democrats allowed to happen. If we pull out of Iraq, it will be another blood bath except this time, the devils will be in control of a vast amount of oil wealth. All the better to buy those plane tickets to the United States, routed through Germany, of course.
    We have become a soft nation. Take a look at New Orleans during Katrina. Thousands of people who did not have enough intelligence to take themselves out of harm’s way because Uncle Sam had taken care of them their whole lives. And when they did leave, were they trying to save their neighbors? No, they were trying to save their TV sets.
    We have been indoctrinated by the “drop out and drop acid” 60’s bunch that war is bad, protecting our nation is bad, and being a super power is bad. Of course, these people are not in their early 20’s any more, they are in their 50’s and they are our congressmen and senators, our reporters and newscasters, professors and teachers and they are the new isolationists of the late 30’s. The “if we leave them alone, they will leave us alone” mindset bunch.
    I don’t blame Americans for the way we are. We basically just want to be left alone and allowed to go to our jobs, raise our kids, watch Dancing With The Stars and bar-b-que on the weekends. But Americans need to realize that even though we do not really care about how the rest of the world lives, the Jolly Jihadists do care about how we live. We are judging them by our standards where we value life more than death, while they value death more than life. They are more dedicated, more driven than we are and until we realize that the terrorists operate under a different set of rules, and we adjust for them, we are in danger. We need to accept that this IS a religious war, Islam against every other religion in the world.
    Our world changed on 9-11. But our memories are short and it has been five years since that horrible day. And in the days of drive-thru fast food, the internet, and immediate gratification standards, being in a war for three years is just too long and we should give up because obviously we can’t win. So those who have been taught that the goal of Islam for the last 14 centuries has been world domination are counting on our inpatience. I fear the Democrats are having the gold key to the U.S. cast as we speak. In two years we may be called not the new world, but the new France.

30. JerseyGrrrl
    November 10th, 2006 at 7:20 pm

    I’ve been assured by local democrats that whenever and wherever the next attack occurs it will be because George Bush has pissed them off.

    Anyway, try this quick history quiz - watch out for trick questions. . .

    1. In 1972 at the Munich Olympics, athletes were kidnapped and massacred by: a. Olga Corbitt b. Sitting Bull c. Arnold Schwartzeneger d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    2. In 1979, the U.S. embassy in Iran was taken over by: a. Lost Norwegians b. Elvis c. A tour bus full of 80-year-old women d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40.

    3. During the 1980’s a number of Americans were kidnapped in Lebanon by: a. John Dillinger b. The King of Sweden c. The Boy Scouts d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    4. In 1983, the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut was blown up by: a. A pizza delivery boy b. Pee Wee Herman c. Geraldo Rivera
    d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    5. In 1985 the cruise ship Achille Lauro was hijacked and a 70 year old American passenger was murdered and thrown overboard in his wheelchair by: a. The Smurfs b. Davy Jones c. The Little Mermaid d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    6. In 1985 TWA flight 847 was hijacked at Athens, and a U.S. Navy diver trying to rescue passengers was murdered by: a. Captain Kid b. Charles Lindberg c. Mother Teresa d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    7. In 1988, Pan Am Flight 103 was bombed by: a. Scooby Doo b. The Tooth Fairy c. Butch Cassidy and The Sundance Kid
    d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    8. In 1993 the World Trade Center was bombed the first time by: a. Richard Simmons b. Grandma Moses c. Michael Jordan d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    9. In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were bombed by: a. Mr. Rogers b. Hillary, to distract attention from Wild Bill’ s women problems c. The World Wrestling Federation d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    10. On 10/12/2000 the USS Cole was attacked killing 17 US sailors and nearly sinking the ship by a) Dale Earnhardt b. Little Bo Peep c. Little Richard d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    11. On 9/11/01, four airliners were hijacked; two were used as missiles to take out the World Trade Centers and of the remaining two, one crashed into the US Pentagon and the other was diverted to a crash by the passengers. Thousands of people were killed by: a. Bugs Bunny, Wiley E. Coyote, Daffy Duck and Elmer Fudd b. The Supreme Court of Florida c. Mr. Bean d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    12. In 2002 the United States fought a war in Afghanistan against: a. Enron b. The Lutheran Church c. The NFL d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    13. In 2002 reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped and murdered by: a. Bonny and Clyde b. Captain Kangaroo c. Billy Graham d. Muslim male extremists mostly between the ages of 17 and 40

    Nope, ………I really don’t see a pattern here to justify profiling, do you?

31. 1sttofight
    November 10th, 2006 at 7:49 pm

    I think killing ALL muslims, regardless of their age would be a good thing.
    But that is just me.

32. Miss B. Haven
    November 13th, 2006 at 1:04 pm

    “Of all the people on here, I would have expected you to find some good in the dem’s taking congress - soon you will have the opportunity to sling hash for more than $5.25/hour”

    I could be the only person in history to resent getting a raise I didn’t earn, but my math goes like this: My hard work + dedication to doing my job right the first time = my boss giving me more money. Whereas the dem’s math would go something like this: My slacker coworkers + zero dedictation to their jobs = more money for them. There is a reason we should leave the issue of salary to businesses, not governtment. Some idiot in Congress who’s never met a minimum-wage worker in his life decides, sight unseen, to give them all a raise. That means prices of the food will go up, the service will be worse-because hey, we’re making 7 bucks an hour, who needs a tip?-, and all-around mediocrity. An easier alternative would be not having me claim my tips. They’re a reward for doing my job well, why should the government get a cut of that? Let’s go the good old capitalist way of rewarding people for doing their jobs right, rather than give them more money “because it’s just not fair.”

33. 1sttofight
    November 13th, 2006 at 1:18 pm

    I read somewhere that only .7% of American workers actually are paid MW.

34. sheehanjihad
    November 13th, 2006 at 4:19 pm

    One more time….there is no such person as a muslim American. They are muslim muslims living in America….they hold zero allegiance to America…only to Allah and mohammed. That is what they are required to do to be a muslim, and if they hold any other allegiance than to Allah or muhammed, they are considered infidels. Period. End of story.

    There is no problem concerning muslims who reside in this country. They will always take care of their own first, and cover the backs of even the most horrid murderers because they are required to by the laws of mohammed and Allah. To do otherwise makes them infidels. Period. End of story.

    If you think that by not profiling muslims is going to help, think again. They dont care if they are profiled, or caught, or killed. There are so many of them standing in line for martyrdom that even if they are captured, they know someone else will take their place.

    That, plus the fact that if captured attempting to kill Americans wholesale, there is a dirth of liberal lawyers who will jump at the chance of making double sure they are protected under the constitution of the country the terrorist swore to destroy. Profile the bastards. Scream out loud if you see one acting weird in the airport. Sure, you will be arrested for a hate crime and forced to apologize, but that beats the hell out of being vaporized in mid air by the weird acting muslim you were afraid to point out.

    Pelosi, Murtha, Reid, Conyer, Durbin, Rangle….all are the fruits of the Islamists efforts to cause the Iraq situation to look bad. They need recruits, and now that they are victorious over our Congress, they will be flooded with young muslim idiots looking to get a piece of the martyr action before there isnt any westeners left to kill. Our Democratic controlled congress has just pounded the first big nail in the coffin of freedom….and half of our citizens helped them do it.

    They will get what they deserve.

35. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 5:19 pm

    As usual Retire your logic is spot on.
    JJ. Thanks for the grin.

36. Professor_Repulso
    November 13th, 2006 at 8:47 pm

    Profile this: For such a determined personality, Churchill could be maddeningly inconsistent. Yet on the issue of Islamic fundamentalism, his views were pungent, precise and astonishingly prescient. In The River War, his account of the reconquest of the Sudan that ended in the battle of Omdurman in 1898, Churchill anticipated many of the themes that preoccupy us today: the nature of terrorism, Islamic fanaticism and the clash of civilisations between the Islamic world and the West.
    “Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith,” he wrote after going into battle himself against the Dervishes, the followers of the Mahdi, the self-proclaimed prophet of Islam who had launched a mass rebellion to drive the infidels out of Egypt. Churchill writes as an enthusiastic imperialist, comparing the “fanatical frenzy” of the Mahdi’s followers to rabid dogs. But his analysis is more nuanced than the language suggests. He understood that extremism flourished amid the “fearful fatalistic apathy” in the Muslim world — precisely the apathy that Britain’s Muslim communities must now urgently combat. Rather than condemn the Dervishes as mere lunatics (as many of his contemporaries did), he sought to understand their suicidal bravery through the “mighty stimulus of fanaticism”.
    In a passage that presages his staunch resistance to Nazism 40 years later, he wrote: “I hope that if evil days should come upon our own country, and the last army which a collapsing Empire could interpose between London and the invader were dissolving in rout and ruin, that there would be some …who would not care to accustom themselves to a new order of things and tamely survive the disaster.”

    Just to clarify, that was Winston, not Ward.

37. sheehanjihad
    November 13th, 2006 at 9:12 pm

    Isnt that funny? Winston Churchill expressing the fanaticism and relentless pursuit of killing infidels…over eighty years ago! I wonder how the Democrats are going to keep telling everyone that Bush pissed them off, and if he didnt, they would be passive peaceful sheepherders now instead of psychotic bloodthirsty butchers. I guess the pope telling about a 12th century popes brush with psychotic bloodthirsty killers wasnt the same Islam Bush is being blamed for forming and making angry.

    Funny part is….the Maahdi is the one Ahmedinejad is waiting for…and the reason the earth needs to be rid of all infidels before he can arise. Winston dealt with the same problem, only they killed all the bastards straight up instead of this appeasement crap. It worked too….it has taken this long for them to become openly bloodthirsty killers again. Oh, sorry, I mean psychotic bloodthirsty killers of peace. There…that’s better.

38. Professor_Repulso
    November 13th, 2006 at 9:20 pm

    But wait! Here’s another one for you SJ: His words from February 1934 seem grimly appropriate: “I have lived through a period when one looked forward, as we do now, with anxiety and uncertainty to what would happen in the future…Suddenly something did happen: tremendous, swift, overpowering, irresistible.”

    Sounds rather timely, don’t you think?

39. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 9:56 pm

    Winston Churchill was a smart assed lil prick.
    Must be one of the reasons I like the man.
    Some of his wisdom is timeless.

40. DW
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:23 pm

    Winston Churchill was a smart assed lil prick.
    GRRRRRRRRRRR….

    Sir Winston Churchill (who was also made an honorary citizen of the US, BTW) was a magnificent leader. He stepped in to fill the gap at a time when things were (arguably) even more dire than they are now. Unlike modern leaders, he wrote his own speeches and those words of his -if you have any soul at all- will bring tears to your eyes.

    The battle of France is over. I expect that the Battle of Britain is about to begin. Upon this battle depends the survival of Christian civilization. Upon it depends our British life, and the long continuity of our institutions and our Empire. The whole fury and might of the enemy must very soon be turned upon us. Hitler knows that he will have to break us in this island or lose the war. Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that, if the British Empire and its Commonwealth last for a thousand years, men will still say This was their finest hour.
    Sir Winston Churchill: June 18, 1940

    He has been described as a bulldog. That analogy of him is bang on. God, we need someone like that today.

41. DW
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:24 pm

    Hero of mine, needless to say…

42. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:26 pm

    DW read my second line.

43. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:30 pm

    Sir if you were my husband I would poison your drink.
    Mam if you were my wife I would drink it.
    Not an exact quote, But close.

44. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:33 pm

    Sir you are drunk.
    Madam you are ugly, And in the morning I will be sober.

    I have some knowlege of the man DW.
    And he was a smart ass. God love him.

45. DW
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:35 pm

    I saw it DEZ.
    Just felt the need to pontificate (don’t forget the decor here in my little hovel has lots of crowns and lions and such -along with some really great wildlife drawings !).
    The man did really come up with some awesome speeches though.

46. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:37 pm

    Well I heard the artist that did the drawings was a smartass lil prick too.

47. Professor_Repulso
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:41 pm

    Saddam was another avid Churchill fan: “We will fight them on the streets, from the rooftops, house to house…” he told George Galloway, shortly before running away to hide in a hole in the ground.
    DEZ, if you are still out there, I have one for you. After all the blather about the MLK memorial, read this and decide if this is what he would like to be remembered for: http://www.straightdope.com/columns/030502.html
    Just read the damn thing. All of it. Please.

48. DW
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:48 pm

    Well I heard the artist that did the drawings was a smartass lil prick too.

    But can he give speeches?

    We shall defend our island whatever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches, we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills, we shall never surrender.

    Urban legend has it that at the end of this speech, somewhat out of breath, he added “and if need be, we shall bash their heads with bottles!”

49. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:51 pm

    Ok prof.
    I read it, All of it.
    I doubt that is how he would like to be remembered.

50. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 10:55 pm

    No the artist can’t give speeches.
    He is just a lil smartass, But he is allowed to respect a man that was really good at being a smartass.
    Churchill had the gift.
    It would have been great to see him and SJ in the same room.

51. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 11:02 pm

    …DW said I Just felt the need to pontificate…

    As cold as it gets up north, Ever think about fornicate, I can send a few pics of
    Ann Coulter.

    Oh DW, I watched a movie called Over the Hedge.
    After reading your story and you passing out time and again.
    I will think of the opossum grabbing his chest and crashing.

52. DW
    November 13th, 2006 at 11:13 pm

    It would have been great to see him and SJ in the same room.
    That would beget a totally new and unusual form of eloquence…

    One last quote, this time from an American (as long as I’m pontificating)
    All America lies at the end of the wilderness road, and our past is not a dead past, but still lives in us. Our forefathers had civilization inside themselves, the wild outside. We live in the civilization they created, but within us the wilderness still lingers. What they dreamed, we live, and what they lived we dream.
    T.K. Whipple: Study out the land
    (quoted at the start of the novel Lonesome Dove)

53. DEZ
    November 13th, 2006 at 11:18 pm

    I must read that novel.
    And I saw the movie Lonesome Dove at wallmart for 5 bucks.

54. DW
    November 13th, 2006 at 11:49 pm

    The movie was fairly well done, DEZ. But do yourself a favor and fork out a few extra bucks for the novel. I think you’ll find it worth your time.
    Then watch the movie. It’s one of the rare times a movie doesn’t completely butcher the novel that spawned it. Either way, enjoy.

55. bernieg1
    December 28th, 2006 at 2:29 pm

    I listed your article as number 13 in 13 Ways Terrorists Can Avoid Arrest

Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.