« Reid Gives Top Senate Spots To Worst Liberals | Home | Indonesian “Militant” Sorry For Beheading 3 Girls »

Church Tax Breaks Challenged - For GOP Help

From our good friends at CNS News:

[AP caption:] Former President Bill Clinton looks on as his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, addresses the congregation during a Sunday service at the Allen AME Church in Queens borough of New York, Sunday Nov. 5, 2006.

Group Wants Churches Investigated After Election

By Nathan Burchfiel
November 14, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - A group that opposes interaction between religion and government has accused four churches of violating restrictions on electioneering leading up to last week’s midterm elections and asked the Internal Revenue Service to investigate.

Tax law prohibits most houses of worship from endorsing candidates for election because of the tax-exempt non-profit status churches enjoy. The restrictions apply to all tax-exempt non-profit groups, not just churches.

According to Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, at least four churches violated that restriction in the 2006 election cycle.

Americans United accused two churches - one in Sioux City, Iowa and another in Hot Springs, Ark. - of supporting Republicans candidates. It also alleged that two Maryland churches illegally supported Democratic candidates.

The Sioux City Baptist Church in Iowa violated its non-profit status by handing out voter guides that were "clearly stacked to favor Republican hopefuls," Lynn charged.

Religious groups are permitted to distribute voter guides, but the guides must meet certain standards of non-partisanship. Americans United has long been critical of voter guides created and distributed by groups like the Christian Coalition. However, courts have upheld their guides as being within the limits.

Lynn accused the Lakeview Assembly of God in Hot Springs, Ark., of violating its tax-exempt status by hosting Republican gubernatorial candidate Asa Hutchinson without including the Democratic nominee, Mike Beebe. Hutchinson, a former U.S. congressman and administrator of the Drug Enforcement Agency, lost to Beebe.

Americans United accused Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Cambridge, Md., of a similar violation for hosting a rally for Democratic gubernatorial candidate Martin O’Malley without including Republican incumbent Robert Ehrlich. O’Malley defeated Ehrlich.

The pastor of Mount Ennon Baptist Church in Clinton, Md., allegedly attacked Republican U.S. Senate candidate Michael Steele from the pulpit on the Sunday before the election as Steele’s opponent, U.S. Rep. Ben Cardin, sat in the congregation. Cardin went on to beat Steele.

"Unfortunately, some churches allow candidate endorsements from the pulpit, distribute biased voter guides and host partisan rallies," Lynn said in a release. "Such blatant electioneering by tax-exempt churches flouts federal law and threatens the integrity of religion."

Priscilla Strother, an assistant to the pastor of Lakeview Assembly of God, told Cybercast News Service that the event with Asa Hutchinson was "not a political rally."

She said the church had invited Beebe to address church membership, but "he would not tell us yes or no."

Rev. Delman Coatest, pastor of Mount Ennon Baptist Church, told Cybercast News Service that he supports federal tax laws prohibiting electioneering and disputed the charges leveled by Americans United.

"At no time have I or the church endorsed or opposed a candidate for public office, nor has the church used its resources for partisan campaigning," he said, adding that when the IRS considers his sermon in context, "they’ll find that to be the case."

Calls placed to Sioux City Baptist Church and Bethel AME were unanswered.

In 2004, the IRS investigated more than 100 non-profit groups accused of violating their tax-exempt status through improper involvement in campaigns. In 58 cases, the IRS Political Activity Compliance Initiative (PACI) determined that prohibited activities had occurred, but it only proposed revocation of tax-exempt status in three cases.

In the other 55 cases, the IRS issued written warnings to the organizations informing them of the violation. According to the PACI report, written advisories were used in cases that appeared to be one-time and isolated violations.

Of the cases that were determined to include improper activity, nine were related to voter guides, 12 focused on pastors who endorsed or opposed a candidate from the pulpit, and nine involved churches that allowed one candidate to appear at a church function without including his or her opponent.

This outfit, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, has a long history of Democrat activism.  It has only thrown in mention of some Democrat violations to prove that they are non-partisan. Any Google of their works will disabuse you of that notion.

But of course the left exploits the pulpit a thousand times more than the right does. Again, any Sunday search of the wire service photo outlets will show that.

Every weekend during the now perpetual campaign season you can always find photos of the top Democrats speaking at some church or other, like Bill and Hillary Rodham above.

The DNC plantation couldn’t function without their churches.

  Print Email

8 Responses to “Church Tax Breaks Challenged - For GOP Help”

  1. 1sttofight

    Bill and Hill appear to be the only white folks in the building.

  2. BillK

    Let’s see, if your church is pro-life and anti gay-marriage, that pretty much means voter guides would be “clearly stacked to favor Republican hopefuls.”

    To once again use Colorado as a guideline:

    Both candidates for governor claimed to be Catholic.
    The Democratic candidate will restore funding to Planned Parenthood.
    The Catholic church believes birth control, not just abortion, is wrong.

    So if you’re an honest Catholic, there’s only one choice. Shocking, the Pope is clearly a Democratic
    shill.

    Amazingly enough, Teddy claims to be Catholic too, as do many other Democrats. According to their own religion, they’ll burn in Hell for their positions. Guess they’re not too worried about that afterlife…

  3. englishqueen01

    Soon the DNC will prescribe to the Elton John approach to religion:

    Ban it entirely (http://dad29.blogspot.com/2006/11/twit-chirps-elton-johns-ideal-world.html).

    So it won’t matter if churches are tax exempt, because the ones the Dems and the liberals hate (Catholic, Orthodox, traditional) will all be outlawed under hate crime legislation in the next 10-15 years.

    That First Amendment only applies when and how the left wants it too.

    According to their own religion, they’ll burn in Hell for their positions. Guess they’re not too worried about that afterlife…

    They’re not afraid to take some of us with them, and have no grasp of the concept that religious people truly fear the threat of eternal damnation and seperation from God. Offering sacrifices to Moloch in the name of progressive tolerance is more important than going to heaven.

  4. clifcrds

    Two images come to mind over this - Bill Clinton in a predominately Black Church in LA with Gray Davis http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOL.....index.html
    when he tried to save Davis’s bacon before he went down to defeat at the hands of the Terminator and who can forget the Welstone Democratic rally . . . . . I mean memorial.

    Same old liberal ideology – “Rules for thee but not for me”.

    Democrats idea of a strong US Military : Tanks in Waco . . . OK / Tanks in Mogadishu . . . NOT OK!

  5. esthier

    As a Christian, I’m honestly offended to see them playing politics in a church during a sunday service. I wouldn’t care if they were just using the building on another day, but during church!

    I’d be equally offended if a Republican did it. I’ve gone to church for most of my life and have never seen anything like that.

  6. englishqueen01

    esthier, I agree.

    A church is not a political stumping ground - conservative or otherwise.

    However, a church has an obligation to teach the truths of its faiths. If that means being conservative on issues of homosexuality, sexual behavior, etc. then so be it.

    But the DNC doesn’t see it that way. Anything that disagrees with their “truths” is automatically labeled political stumping…for Republicans. But when they do it, it’s merely religious outreach.

  7. Nimblicity

    Many American Protestant denominations are no longer churches in the traditional sense, at least as far as the leadership is concerned. They are NGO’s (non-government organizations) with a thin veneer of religiosity.

    Take for example, the Episcopalian’s American Presiding Bishop Most Rev. Katherine Jefferts Schori’s reply to the question, “What will be your focus as head of the U.S. church?”

    Our focus needs to be on feeding people who go to bed hungry, on providing primary education to girls and boys, on healing people with AIDS, on addressing tuberculosis and malaria, on sustainable development. That ought to be the primary focus.

    http://www.time.com/time/magaz.....87,00.html

    Noble goals, all; but is this a Christian communion or the United Way? The primary focus of the Church used to be the Great Commission. Now Jesus doesn’t make the list of “primary focus” anymore. And lest you be deceived, she does not mean the EC feeding people necessarily; that’s a band-aid till they can get you to feed them. They mean their primary focus is demanding legislation that will force you to educate and heal through taxation and government programs. And if you and your property rights pose a threat to “sustainable development,” they’ll finally remember the Deity and drop a holy legal God-bomb on you through legislation, or failing that, the courts.

  8. mathews

    With Charlie Rangle in charge those tax breaks for all will retire meaning tax increases for all.


Leave a Reply

You must be registered and logged in to post a comment.


« Front Page | To Top
« Reid Gives Top Senate Spots To Worst Liberals | Indonesian “Militant” Sorry For Beheading 3 Girls »